AMD Radeon R7 360 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 115 Watt
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 804.436
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 3845
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3485
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 3845
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3485

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X

• Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
• Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
• Around 22% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3189 vs 3114
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 522 vs 512
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 vs 38.068
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 vs 3.386
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 vs 58.285
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 vs 188.858
• Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1481 vs 1402

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3114 3189
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	512 522
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	38.068 43.745
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	819.203 804.436
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.386 3.673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.285 64.088
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	188.858 221.539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4799 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4147 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4799 3845
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4147 3485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1402 1481

Compare specifications (specs)