AMD Radeon R7 360 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD Radeon R7 260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 804.436
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 3845
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3485
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 3845
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3485
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 vs 8 October 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 vs 804.436 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 vs 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 vs 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 3485 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- Around 22% better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3190 vs 3106
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 523 vs 513
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.745 vs 38.068
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.673 vs 3.386
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 64.088 vs 58.285
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 221.539 vs 188.858
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1481 vs 1402
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 50.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 1,613 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3190 vs 3106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 vs 513 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.745 vs 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.673 vs 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.088 vs 58.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 221.539 vs 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1481 vs 1402 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3106 | 3190 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 | 523 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | 43.745 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | 804.436 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | 3.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | 64.088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | 221.539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | 3845 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 3485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 | 1481 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD Radeon R7 260X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Tobago | Bonaire |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series |
Launch date | 18 June 2015 | 8 October 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | $139 |
Place in performance rating | 645 | 648 |
Price now | $146.65 | $239 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | 17.15 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Stream Processors | 768 | 896 |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 165 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 104 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |