AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 265 and AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 11.4x more texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s
- 12.8x more pipelines: 1024 vs 80
- 18.2x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 13 February 2014 vs 5 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 5.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
- 7.9x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI
Name | AMD Radeon R7 265 | AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.163 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 265 | AMD Radeon HD 7350 PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Cedar |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 13 February 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 1704 | 1703 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 80 |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 5.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 292 million |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 210 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |