AMD Radeon R7 265 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 265 and AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 3.8x more texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1024 vs 480
- 3x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 624.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 13 February 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 480 |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 265
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
Name | AMD Radeon R7 265 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 265 | AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Pitcairn | Turks |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 13 February 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 1704 | 1705 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 480 |
Stream Processors | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 716 million |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 210 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync |