AMD Radeon R7 350 vs ATI Radeon 9100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and ATI Radeon 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 12.8x more texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 9x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 500 MHz
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 vs 1 April 2003 |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9100
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 55 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9100
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 350 | ATI Radeon 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | ATI Radeon 9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rage 7 |
| Code name | Cape Verde | R200 |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 | 1 April 2003 |
| Place in performance rating | 1083 | 1081 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 60 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 8.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |

