AMD Radeon R7 350 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and NVIDIA Quadro M500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher texture fill rate: 25.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 vs 6099
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 1729
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3122
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 1729
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3122
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 vs 27 April 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 vs 6099 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 vs 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 vs 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3122 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 800 MHz
- Around 5% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 819.2 gflops
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2174 vs 2072
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2174 vs 2072
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops vs 819.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 vs 2072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 vs 2072 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA Quadro M500M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | 6099 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 2174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 2174 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 1729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3122 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1171 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 350 | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cape Verde | GM108 |
| Launch date | 6 July 2016 | 27 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1083 | 1084 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 350 with others
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 XT
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
AMDFirePro M4150
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelIris Graphics 6100
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
AMDRadeon R7 350 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
