AMD Radeon R7 350 vs Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350 and Intel Iris Graphics 6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 10.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 48
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7787 vs 3025
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2072 vs 1404
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3122 vs 1139
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3331
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2072 vs 1404
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3122 vs 1139
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3331
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 July 2016 vs 5 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 vs 3025 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 vs 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 vs 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 vs 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3331 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 350 | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7787 | 3025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.508 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 647.813 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.6 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 109.558 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2072 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3122 | 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3331 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2072 | 1404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3122 | 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3331 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 900 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 350 | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde | Broadwell GT3 |
Launch date | 6 July 2016 | 5 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1083 | 1085 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 25.6 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 189 million |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |