AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher pipelines: 384 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3321
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 31 May 2010 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 352 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 26.7 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 855.4 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9276 vs 7888
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2999 vs 2097
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2999 vs 2097
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3660 vs 3127
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3660 vs 3127
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 26.7 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 855.4 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9276 vs 7888 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2999 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2999 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3660 vs 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3660 vs 3127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7888 | 9276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2097 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2097 | 2999 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 | 3660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 | 3321 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2673 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 462 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 19.079 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 741.303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.516 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.513 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 64.492 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Oland | GF100 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 31 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 833 | 825 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Price now | $263.28 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.73 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 855.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 352 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 26.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,100 million |
Compute performance | 30x | |
CUDA cores | 352 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pins |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 102.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1603 MHz (3206 data rate) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |