NVIDIA Tesla M10 vs AMD Radeon R7 360

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M10 and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M10

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 9x more texture fill rate: 4x 52.24 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 50.4 GTexel / s
• 3.3x more pipelines: 4x 640 vs 768
• 4.1x better floating-point performance: 4x 1,672 gflops vs 1,613 gflops
• 16x more maximum memory size: 4x 8 GB vs 2 GB
• 5x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.191 vs 38.068
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5204 vs 4799
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5204 vs 4799

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3129 vs 2994
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 514 vs 395
• Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16433 vs 10362
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 vs 814.192
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 vs 50.918
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 vs 180.026
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 3693
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3306
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 3693
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3306

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M10
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2994 3129
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	395 514
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10362 16433
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.191 38.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	814.192 819.203
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	50.918 58.285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	180.026 188.858
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5204 4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3693 4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3306 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5204 4799
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3693 4147
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3306 3356

Compare specifications (specs)