AMD Radeon R7 360 versus AMD FirePro W5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD FirePro W5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 50.4 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,613 gflops versus 1,428 gflops
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3106 versus 2989
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16433 versus 11644
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 versus 35.15
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 versus 3.199
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 versus 57.354
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 versus 163.258
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 versus 4397
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 versus 3688
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 versus 4397
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 versus 3688
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 31 March 2014 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops versus 1,428 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3106 versus 2989 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 versus 11644 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 versus 35.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 versus 3.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 versus 57.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 versus 163.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 versus 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 versus 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 versus 3688 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5100
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 5.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 versus 513
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 versus 819.203
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 versus 513 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 versus 819.203 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3106 | 2989 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 513 | 537 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 | 11644 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | 35.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | 838.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | 3.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | 57.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | 163.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | Tobago | Bonaire |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 31 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 645 | 646 |
| Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Stream Processors | 768 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 165 mm | 171 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | None |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 360 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260X
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDFirePro M5100
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
AMDFirePro W5100
AMDRadeon R7 360 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
