AMD Radeon R7 360 versus AMD FirePro W5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 360 and AMD FirePro W5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 50.4 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s
- Environ 13% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,613 gflops versus 1,428 gflops
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3106 versus 2988
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16433 versus 11683
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.068 versus 35.15
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.386 versus 3.199
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 versus 57.354
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 188.858 versus 163.258
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 versus 4397
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 versus 3688
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 versus 4397
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 versus 3688
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 versus 31 March 2014 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops versus 1,428 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3106 versus 2988 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 versus 11683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 versus 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 versus 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 versus 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 versus 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 versus 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 versus 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 versus 3688 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5100
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 5.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 536 versus 514
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 versus 819.203
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 versus 514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 versus 819.203 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD FirePro W5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3106 | 2988 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 514 | 536 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16433 | 11683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 360 | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | Tobago | Bonaire |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2015 | 31 March 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 645 | 646 |
Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,613 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 930 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 165 mm | 171 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | None |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |