AMD Radeon R7 360 vs ATI FireMV 2250

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 360 and ATI FireMV 2250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 21x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
• Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 68.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3140 vs 46
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 290

Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2250

• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 100 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 360
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2250

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3140 46
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	515 290

Compare specifications (specs)