AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 60 Watt
360x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3329
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3329

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 June 2016 vs 18 February 2014
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt vs 60 Watt
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355 vs 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 730 MHz
Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 780 MHz
2.3x more texture fill rate: 43.4 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
2.3x better floating-point performance: 1,389 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 370
3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 1090
Around 95% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 5924
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3341
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3341

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 730 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate	43.4 GTexel / s vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops vs 599.0 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	521 vs 370
PassMark - G3D Mark	3901 vs 1090
Geekbench - OpenCL	11526 vs 5924
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3683 vs 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3683 vs 3341

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

370

521

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1090

3901

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

5924

11526

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3341

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3341

3683

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3329

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3355

3329

Name	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark	370	521
PassMark - G3D Mark	1090	3901
Geekbench - OpenCL	5924	11526
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3341	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3341	3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3355	3329
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3355	3329
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4843
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		117

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Oland	GM107
Launch date	30 June 2016	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	699	707
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	780 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	730 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	640
Texture fill rate	18.72 GTexel / s	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		5.7" (14.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA