AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
Around 9% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 850 MHz
Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
Around 31% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1920 vs 782
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 524 vs 247

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	30 June 2016 vs 27 January 2014
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 850 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1920 vs 782
PassMark - G2D Mark	524 vs 247

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 30.11 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 9728

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	30.11 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	15796 vs 9728

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1920

782

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

524

247

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

9728

15796

Name	AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce 825M
PassMark - G3D Mark	1920	782
PassMark - G2D Mark	524	247
Geekbench - OpenCL	9728	15796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	24.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	638.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	41.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	112.347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce 825M
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler 2.0
Code name	Cape Verde	GK208
Launch date	30 June 2016	27 January 2014
Place in performance rating	785	786
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	925 MHz	850 MHz
Floating-point performance	947.2 gflops	722.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	384
Texture fill rate	29.6 GTexel / s	30.11 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	33 Watt
Transistor count	1,500 million	1300 Million
Boost clock speed		941 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	72 GB / s	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	4500 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Shared memory		0