AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 825M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
  • Around 31% better floating-point performance: 947.2 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.5x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1908 vs 782
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 247
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 June 2016 vs 27 January 2014
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 850 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 384
Floating-point performance 947.2 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1908 vs 782
PassMark - G2D Mark 527 vs 247

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 825M

  • Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 30.11 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15796 vs 9743
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 30.11 GTexel / s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 15796 vs 9743

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 825M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1908
782
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
527
247
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
9743
15796
Name AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 825M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1908 782
PassMark - G2D Mark 527 247
Geekbench - OpenCL 9743 15796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 638.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.619
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 41.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 112.347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2809
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 825M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler 2.0
Code name Cape Verde GK208
Launch date 30 June 2016 27 January 2014
Place in performance rating 787 788
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 925 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 947.2 gflops 722.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 512 384
Texture fill rate 29.6 GTexel / s 30.11 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 1300 Million
Boost clock speed 941 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 4500 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0