AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 365 Watt
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1707 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 394
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 vs 107.239
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3330
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 vs 24 March 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 365 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1707 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 394 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 vs 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3330 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 77.7 billion / sec vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 512
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 947.2 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 2 GB
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 1908
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12811 vs 9743
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 vs 24.788
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 vs 638.196
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 vs 2.619
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 vs 41.414
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4118 vs 2809
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4118 vs 2809
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 947.2 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 vs 1908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 vs 9743 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 vs 24.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 vs 638.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 vs 2.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 vs 41.414 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 vs 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 vs 2809 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3666 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 | 3341 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 | 394 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9743 | 12811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 30.921 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 1116.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 3.799 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 49.114 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 107.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 4118 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3330 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde | GF110 |
Launch date | 30 June 2016 | 24 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 787 | 790 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $184 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | 2x 1,244.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 29.6 GTexel / s | 77.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 365 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,000 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 327.7 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 1707 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |