AMD Radeon R7 A265 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 A265 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 A265
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
Launch date | 9 January 2014 vs 23 May 2013 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 863 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 900 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 8.1x more texture fill rate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- 6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 384
- 6.6x better floating-point performance: 4,156 gflops vs 633.6 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 8.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8009 vs 994
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 468
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24011 vs 6925
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 863 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops vs 633.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8009 vs 994 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 468 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 24011 vs 6925 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 A265
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 A265 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 | 8009 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6925 | 24011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2780 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 A265 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Opal | GK110 |
Launch date | 9 January 2014 | 23 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 455 | 456 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
Price now | $740.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | 900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 863 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 19.8 GTexel / s | 160.5 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 7,080 million |
CUDA cores | 2304 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |