AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 6570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 758 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 14.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 1561
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 4.278
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.464
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 13.633
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 59.183
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1296
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1044
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2716
- Around 72% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 vs 846
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 7 February 2011 |
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s vs 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 1561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 vs 4.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 vs 0.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 vs 13.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 vs 59.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2716 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 vs 846 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
- Around 18% better floating-point performance: 624.0 gflops vs 526.8 gflops
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 vs 206.354
- 38.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 vs 33.5
- 30.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 vs 33.9
- 45.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 vs 60
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 480 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 624.0 gflops vs 526.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 vs 206.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 vs 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 vs 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 vs 60 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 1561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 4.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 255.525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 13.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 59.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 2716 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 846 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Wani | Thames |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 7 February 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1435 | 1426 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Price now | $49.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,410 million | 716 million |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||


