AMD Radeon R7 Graphics versus AMD Radeon HD 6570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon HD 6570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 758 MHz versus 650 MHz
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 16.46 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 40 Watt
- 14.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 versus 1561
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 versus 4.278
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 versus 0.464
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 versus 13.633
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 versus 59.183
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 versus 1296
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 versus 1044
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 2716
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 versus 846
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 7 February 2011 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz versus 650 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s versus 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 40 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 versus 1561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 versus 4.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 versus 0.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 versus 13.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 versus 59.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 versus 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 versus 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 2716 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 versus 846 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6570
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 624.0 gflops versus 526.8 gflops
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 255.525 versus 206.354
- 38.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1296 versus 33.5
- 30.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1044 versus 33.9
- 45.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2716 versus 60
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 624.0 gflops versus 526.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 255.525 versus 206.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1296 versus 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1044 versus 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2716 versus 60 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6570
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6570 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 1561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 4.278 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 255.525 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | 0.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | 13.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | 59.183 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 2716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 2716 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | 846 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 6570 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Wani | Thames |
| Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 7 February 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1435 | 1426 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $79 | |
| Prix maintenant | $49.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 19.92 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 758 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 526.8 gflops | 624.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 16.46 GTexel / s | 15.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 716 million |
| Stream Processors | 480 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
| Longeur | 168 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||


