AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 810M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • 2.8x more texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • 3.7x better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 14.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 1607
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 4.403
  • Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 131.239
  • Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1076
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1833
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3035
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 31 May 2016 vs 24 March 2014
Texture fill rate 16.46 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Floating-point performance 526.8 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 22612 vs 1607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.145 vs 4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 206.354 vs 131.239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1979 vs 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2101 vs 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3035

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

  • 3.7x more core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 32.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1076 vs 33.5
  • 54.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 33.9
  • 50.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 60
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 738 MHz vs 200 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1076 vs 33.5
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1833 vs 33.9
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3035 vs 60

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
22612
1607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15.145
4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
206.354
131.239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1979
1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2101
1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33.5
1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33.9
1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
60
3035
Name AMD Radeon R7 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 810M
Geekbench - OpenCL 22612 1607
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 15.145 4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 206.354 131.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 85.46
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1979 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2101 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 33.5 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 33.9 1833
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 60 3035
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1457
PassMark - G3D Mark 413
PassMark - G2D Mark 66

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 3.0 Fermi 2.0
Code name Wani GF117
Launch date 31 May 2016 24 March 2014
Place in performance rating 1440 1442
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 758 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 738 MHz
Floating-point performance 526.8 gflops 141.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 48
Texture fill rate 16.46 GTexel / s 5.904 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 2,410 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface IGP PCIe 2.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Memory type System Shared DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz