AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 810M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 810M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 3.7x better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 14.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 1607
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 4.403
- Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 131.239
- Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1076
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1833
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3035
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 vs 24 March 2014 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 vs 1607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 vs 4.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 vs 131.239 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 vs 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 vs 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3035 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 32.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1076 vs 33.5
- 54.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 33.9
- 50.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 60
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1076 vs 33.5 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 vs 33.9 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 vs 60 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 810M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22612 | 1607 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.145 | 4.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 206.354 | 131.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.2 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.15 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 85.46 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1979 | 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2101 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33.5 | 1076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 33.9 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 60 | 3035 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1457 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 418 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 66 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 810M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Wani | GF117 |
| Launch date | 31 May 2016 | 24 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1435 | 1437 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 758 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 738 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 526.8 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 16.46 GTexel / s | 5.904 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,410 million | 585 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |

