AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs AMD Radeon R7 M260

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and AMD Radeon R7 M260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 5130
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 14.249
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 145.3
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.925
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 19.992
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 77.895
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1404
• Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1093
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1704

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260

• 4.7x more core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 758 MHz
• Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 16.46 GTexel / s
• Around 37% better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 526.8 gflops
• 41.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 33.5
• 32.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1093 vs 33.9
• 28.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1704 vs 60

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22612 5130
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.145 14.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	206.354 145.3
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.2 0.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.15 19.992
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	85.46 77.895
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1979 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101 1093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 1704
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.5 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.9 1093
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60 1704

Compare specifications (specs)