AMD Radeon R7 Graphics vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 820M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Graphics

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 65% higher texture fill rate: 16.46 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
• 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 526.8 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
• 8.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22612 vs 2775
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 15.145 vs 7.765
• Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 206.354 vs 161.305
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.2 vs 0.686
• Around 69% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.15 vs 14.257
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 85.46 vs 22.768
• Around 66% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1979 vs 1195
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2101 vs 1447
• Around 72% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1457 vs 847

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• 4.1x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 35.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 33.5
• 42.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 vs 33.9
• 55.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 60

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22612 2775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.145 7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	206.354 161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.2 0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.15 14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	85.46 22.768
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1979 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2101 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.5 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.9 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	60 3349
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	1457 847

Compare specifications (specs)