AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 4.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 502 vs 101
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 78
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 1 April 2004 |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s vs 4.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 502 vs 101 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 78 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 502 | 101 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 78 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5123 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Curie |
Code name | Topaz | NV40 A1 |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 1 April 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $2,199 |
Place in performance rating | 1487 | 1484 |
Price now | $799 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 375 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | 4.5 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 222 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 142 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 8x |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |