AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and AMD Radeon HD 7420G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 480 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 655 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 499 vs 309
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 105
- 7.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5079 vs 675
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1093 vs 881
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1093 vs 881
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 1 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz vs 480 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 655 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 499 vs 309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5079 vs 675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 vs 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 vs 881 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7420G
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2023 vs 1704
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2023 vs 1704
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2023 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2023 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7420G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | AMD Radeon HD 7420G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 499 | 309 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5079 | 675 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 2023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | 881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 2023 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260 | AMD Radeon HD 7420G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Terascale 3 |
Code name | Topaz | Trinity |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
Place in performance rating | 1487 | 1490 |
Price now | $799 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 655 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 480 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |