AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs AMD Radeon HD 7420G
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and AMD Radeon HD 7420G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 940 MHz vs 480 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 655 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 498 vs 309
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 120 vs 105
- 7.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4841 vs 675
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1093 vs 881
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1093 vs 881
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 1 June 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz vs 480 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 655 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 498 vs 309 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 vs 105 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4841 vs 675 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 vs 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 vs 881 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7420G
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2023 vs 1704
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2023 vs 1704
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2023 vs 1704 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2023 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7420G
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | AMD Radeon HD 7420G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 498 | 309 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 105 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4841 | 675 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 2023 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | 881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 2023 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M260 | AMD Radeon HD 7420G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Terascale 3 |
| Code name | Topaz | Trinity |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1483 | 1486 |
| Price now | $799 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 655 MHz |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 480 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M260 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 345M
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7420G
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
AMDFirePro M2000
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 710
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
IntelHD Graphics 5500
AMDRadeon R7 M260 vs
IntelHD Graphics 615
