AMD Radeon R7 M260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M260 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 22.56 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 97% better floating-point performance: 721.9 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5079 vs 1948
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 14.249 vs 6.705
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 145.3 vs 100.391
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.925 vs 0.441
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.992 vs 8.146
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 77.895 vs 20.64
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 977
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 977
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 vs 27 March 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5079 vs 1948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 vs 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 vs 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 977 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 940 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 628 vs 499
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 211 vs 120
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1093
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1833 vs 1704
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1093
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 vs 1704
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 940 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 vs 499 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 vs 120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 vs 1704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 1093 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 vs 1704 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M260
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 499 | 628 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 120 | 211 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5079 | 1948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.249 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 145.3 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.925 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.992 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 77.895 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1093 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1704 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1093 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1704 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M260 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Topaz | GK208B |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
Launch date | 11 June 2014 | 27 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | $34.99 |
Place in performance rating | 1487 | 1488 |
Price now | $799 | $34.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.33 | 23.15 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 721.9 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 22.56 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |