AMD Radeon R7 M340 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M340 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M340

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 943 MHz vs 914 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

• Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1021 MHz
• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 44.96 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 640 vs 320
• 2.6x better floating-point performance: 1,439 gflops vs 549.1 gflops
• 2.5x more memory clock speed: 1000 or 2500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• 4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2577 vs 651
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 217 vs 152
• Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9744 vs 5185
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.396 vs 13.48
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 373.644 vs 164.511
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.54 vs 0.943
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.412 vs 20.063
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.158 vs 74.38
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4148 vs 1550
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1732
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1668
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4148 vs 1550
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1732
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1668

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M340
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	651 2577
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	152 217
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5185 9744
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	13.48 42.396
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	164.511 373.644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.943 2.54
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.063 39.412
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	74.38 139.158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1550 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1732 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1550 4148
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1732 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1668 3358

Compare specifications (specs)