NVIDIA GeForce 910M vs AMD Radeon R7 M340

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 910M and AMD Radeon R7 M340 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 910M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2590 vs 1732
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3020 vs 1668
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2590 vs 1732
• Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3020 vs 1668

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M340

• Around 22% higher core clock speed: 943 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 17.16 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• Around 85% better floating-point performance: 549.1 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 651 vs 588
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 152 vs 113
• Around 97% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5185 vs 2629
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.48 vs 6.448
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 164.511 vs 155.993
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.943 vs 0.574
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.063 vs 12.2
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.38 vs 27.733
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1550 vs 1344
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1550 vs 1344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M340

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	588 651
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	113 152
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2629 5185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.448 13.48
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	155.993 164.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.574 0.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.2 20.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.733 74.38
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1344 1550
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2590 1732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3020 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1344 1550
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2590 1732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3020 1668

Compare specifications (specs)