Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon R7 M340

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon R7 M340 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1021 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1042 vs 651
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 241 vs 152
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.062 vs 13.48
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 273.504 vs 164.511
• Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.777 vs 0.943
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2227 vs 1668
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2227 vs 1668

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M340

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 943 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 13.3x more pipelines: 320 vs 24
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5185 vs 4592
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.063 vs 19.939
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 74.38 vs 31.881
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1550 vs 1397
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1732 vs 878
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1550 vs 1397
• Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1732 vs 878

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M340

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1042 651
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	241 152
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4592 5185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.062 13.48
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	273.504 164.511
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.777 0.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.939 20.063
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.881 74.38
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1550
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1397 1550
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	878 1732
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2227 1668

Compare specifications (specs)