AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M370 and ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M370
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 825 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1418 vs 709
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 vs 224
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 26 January 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1418 vs 709 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 224 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
- 9.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 13.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 23.04 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2x 320 vs 384
- Around 43% better floating-point performance: 2x 528.0 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2449
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2449
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 13.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 23.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 320 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 528.0 gflops vs 737.3 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 2449 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 2449 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1418 | 709 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 224 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.653 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1484 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2449 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1484 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2449 | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R7 M370 | ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale |
| Code name | Litho | R680 |
| Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 26 January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 948 | 945 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 960 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 737.3 gflops | 2x 528.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2x 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 23.04 GTexel / s | 2x 13.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 666 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 165 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 2x 57.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1802 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Zero Core | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R7 M370 with others
AMDRadeon R7 M370 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
AMDRadeon R7 M370 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX Go5600
AMDRadeon R7 M370 vs
ATIRadeon HD 3870 X2
AMDRadeon R7 M370 vs
AMDFirePro M4000
AMDRadeon R7 M370 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8410G IGP
AMDRadeon R7 M370 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720A
