AMD Radeon R7 M440 vs AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M440 and AMD Radeon R7 360 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M440
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 18 June 2015 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 360
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 50.4 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,613 gflops vs 653.4 gflops
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3140 vs 897
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 vs 170
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4799 vs 1935
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4799 vs 1935
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 vs 2067
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 vs 2067
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2537
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2537
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16200 vs 5598
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 50.4 GTexel / s vs 20.42 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,613 gflops vs 653.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3140 vs 897 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 vs 170 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4799 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4799 vs 1935 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 vs 2067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 vs 2067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2537 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16200 vs 5598 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M440
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M440 | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 897 | 3140 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 170 | 515 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1935 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1935 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2067 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2067 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2537 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2537 | 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5598 | 16200 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.068 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.386 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 188.858 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M440 | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Meso | Tobago |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1112 | 601 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $146.65 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1021 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 653.4 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 20.42 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 2,080 million |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 165 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |