AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs AMD Radeon R5 230
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and AMD Radeon R5 230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.7x more texture fill rate: 18.4 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 320 vs 160
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 588.8 gflops vs 200.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 944 vs 222
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5345 vs 4127
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 439
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2138 vs 992
- 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 439
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2138 vs 992
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 vs 3 April 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops vs 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 944 vs 222 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5345 vs 4127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 vs 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 vs 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 vs 992 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 230
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 15-25 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 255 vs 176
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2480 vs 1853
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2480 vs 1853
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 15-25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 255 vs 176 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2480 vs 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2480 vs 1853 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 230
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 944 | 222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 255 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5345 | 4127 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 278.624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.335 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.067 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 | 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2138 | 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1853 | 2480 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 | 439 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2138 | 992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1853 | 2480 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 M445 | AMD Radeon R5 230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Meso | Caicos |
Launch date | 15 May 2016 | 3 April 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1309 | 1311 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Price now | $50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.10 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 200.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 320 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 18.4 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 1.0 x4 | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | N / A | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 10.67 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
PowerPlay |