AMD Radeon R7 M445 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 M445 and NVIDIA Quadro 4000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 780 MHz vs 475 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 100 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5343 vs 5212
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 vs 1413
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2138 vs 865
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1853 vs 1254
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 vs 1413
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2138 vs 865
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1853 vs 1254

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

• Around 45% higher texture fill rate: 26.6 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
• Around 5% higher pipelines: 336 vs 320
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 638.4 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1278 vs 939
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 176
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.42 vs 15.765
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 738.724 vs 278.624
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.068 vs 1.268
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 33.126 vs 24.335
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 81.823 vs 54.067

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M445
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	939 1278
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	176 269
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	5343 5212
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.765 21.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	278.624 738.724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.268 2.068
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.335 33.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.067 81.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1913 1413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2138 865
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1853 1254

Compare specifications (specs)