NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 vs AMD Radeon R7 M460
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 and AMD Radeon R7 M460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 94% better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 864.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 19.679
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 358.673
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 1.572
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 vs 30.024
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 85.168
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 27 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 864.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 vs 19.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 vs 358.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 vs 1.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 vs 30.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 vs 85.168 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M460
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1033 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M460
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 | 19.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 | 358.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 | 1.572 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 | 30.024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 | 85.168 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1054 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4999 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2294 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1767 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2772 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2294 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1767 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2772 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | AMD Radeon R7 M460 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GM107 | Meso |
| Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1217 | 1218 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 27 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 with others
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
ATIRadeon IGP 350M
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5200 Ultra
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M460
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
IntelHD Graphics 630
