AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics

Intel HD Graphics 4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 877 vs 754
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 877 vs 754
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2817 vs 2392
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2817 vs 2392

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 February 2014 vs 14 May 2012
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	877 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	877 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2817 vs 2392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2817 vs 2392

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4000

Around 17% higher core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 554 MHz
Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 800 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 90 Watt
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1492 vs 1131
Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1492 vs 1131

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	650 MHz vs 554 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 90 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1492 vs 1131
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1492 vs 1131

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

877

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

877

754

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1131

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1131

1492

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2817

2392

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2817

2392

Name	AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 4000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	877	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	877	754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1131	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1131	1492
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2817	2392
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2817	2392
PassMark - G3D Mark		347
PassMark - G2D Mark		194
Geekbench - OpenCL		538
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		8.712
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		155.638
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.931
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		7.36
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		12.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 2.0	Generation 7.0
Code name	Spectre	Ivy Bridge GT2
Launch date	17 February 2014	14 May 2012
Place in performance rating	1385	1501
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	554 MHz	650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	22 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	90 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	2,410 million	1,200 million
Floating-point performance		33.6 gflops
Pipelines		16
Texture fill rate		4.2 GTexel / s
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	IGP	PCIe 1.0 x16
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	11.1 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.0
Memory
Memory bus width		64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync