AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs AMD Radeon HD 7970M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and AMD Radeon HD 7970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 850 MHz
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40722 vs 17210
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 24 April 2012 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40722 vs 17210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3339 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7970M
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 68 GTexel / s vs 29.76 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 512
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,176 gflops vs 952.3 gflops
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 496 vs 388
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3569 vs 1420
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5094 vs 3112
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5094 vs 3112
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3692 vs 3168
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3692 vs 3168
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 68 GTexel / s vs 29.76 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,176 gflops vs 952.3 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 496 vs 388 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3569 vs 1420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5094 vs 3112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5094 vs 3112 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3692 vs 3168 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3692 vs 3168 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7970M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | 496 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1420 | 3569 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40722 | 17210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3112 | 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3112 | 5094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3168 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3168 | 3692 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3339 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.181 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1121.002 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.355 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.527 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 256.99 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | AMD Radeon HD 7970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde | Wimbledon |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 612 | 615 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 29.76 GTexel / s | 68 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |