AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 6.2x more texture fill rate: 61.6 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 18.7x more pipelines: 896 vs 48
- 15.1x better floating-point performance: 1,971 gflops vs 130.56 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 9.8x more memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 666 MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 249
- 12.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3048 vs 251
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 3 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 896 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops vs 130.56 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 666 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 vs 249 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3048 vs 251 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 85 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 85 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 508 | 249 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3048 | 251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 971 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 971 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1980 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1980 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Bonaire | GT216 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 665 | 667 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 130.56 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 32 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 486 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 183 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | 10.66 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | 666 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |