AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 vs 573
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 vs 27 September 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 vs 573 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 896
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5255 vs 3182
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 971
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 971
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1980
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1980
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 109.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1344 vs 896 |
Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops vs 1,971 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5255 vs 3182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 971 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1980 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1980 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 586 | 573 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3182 | 5255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 971 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 971 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1980 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1980 | 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14380 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.336 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1351.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.121 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 156.419 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Bonaire | GK104 |
Launch date | 21 December 2013 | 27 September 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 584 | 585 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 915 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 896 | 1344 |
Texture fill rate | 61.6 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 183 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 104.0 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6500 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |