AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 915 MHz
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 170 Watt
  • Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz
  • Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 586 vs 579
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 27 September 2013
Core clock speed 1100 MHz vs 915 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 170 Watt
Memory clock speed 6500 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 586 vs 579

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

  • Around 78% higher texture fill rate: 109.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 896
  • Around 34% better floating-point performance: 2,634 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5241 vs 3182
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 971
  • 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 971
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1980
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1980
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 109.8 GTexel / s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1344 vs 896
Floating-point performance 2,634 gflops vs 1,971 gflops
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5241 vs 3182
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 971
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 971
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 1980
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 1980

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
586
579
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3182
5241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
971
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
971
3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1980
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1980
3357
Name AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
PassMark - G2D Mark 586 579
PassMark - G3D Mark 3182 5241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 971 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 971 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1980 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1980 3357
Geekbench - OpenCL 14380
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 41.336
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1351.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 4.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 58.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 156.419

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Essentials

Architecture GCN 2.0 Kepler
Code name Bonaire GK104
Launch date 21 December 2013 27 September 2013
Place in performance rating 574 565
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 1100 MHz 915 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,971 gflops 2,634 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 896 1344
Texture fill rate 61.6 GTexel / s 109.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 170 Watt
Transistor count 2,080 million 3,540 million
Boost clock speed 980 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 183 mm 241 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 2x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 104.0 GB / s 192.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 6500 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5