AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 285 and ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 918 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 25.7x more texture fill rate: 102.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 22.4x more pipelines: 1792 vs 80
- 41.1x better floating-point performance: 3,290 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 5.5x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 39.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 170
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 352
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 September 2014 vs 1 April 2010 |
Core clock speed | 918 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 vs 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 352 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
- 11.2x lower typical power consumption: 17 Watt vs 190 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 285
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 285 | ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 170 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | 352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 391.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2782 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 285 | ATI FirePro 2460 Multi-View | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Tonga | Cedar |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 2 September 2014 | 1 April 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Place in performance rating | 456 | 457 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 918 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 102.8 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 17 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 292 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 170 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 176.0 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |