AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 285 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 84% higher core clock speed: 918 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 25.7x more texture fill rate: 102.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 22.4x more pipelines: 1792 vs 80
- 41.1x better floating-point performance: 3,290 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 38.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 175
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 353
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 September 2014 vs 5 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 918 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 102.8 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 80 |
Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 vs 175 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 353 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
- 19x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 190 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 285
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 285 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | 175 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | 353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 391.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2782 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 285 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 530v | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Tonga | M92 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 2 September 2014 | 5 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Place in performance rating | 456 | 453 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 918 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 80 |
Texture fill rate | 102.8 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 176.0 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |