Apple M2 Pro 16-core vs AMD Radeon R9 285
Comparative analysis of Apple M2 Pro 16-core and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Apple M2 Pro 16-core
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1398 MHz vs 918 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 28 nm
Launch date | 17 Jan 2023 vs 2 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1398 MHz vs 918 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285
- 112x more pipelines: 1792 vs 16
Pipelines | 1792 vs 16 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Apple M2 Pro 16-core
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285
Name | Apple M2 Pro 16-core | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47728 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.632 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.954 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 391.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2782 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Apple M2 Pro 16-core | AMD Radeon R9 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 17 Jan 2023 | 2 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 455 | 456 |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | |
Code name | Tonga | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1398 MHz | 918 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.726 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 16 | 1792 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 102.8 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Memory |
||
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 176.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |