AMD Radeon R9 350 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9926 vs 4657
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2609 vs 1870
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2609 vs 1870
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 1596
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 1596
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 3309
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 3309
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 vs 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 3309 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 95 Watt
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 12 June 2015 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9926 | 4657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 3309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 350 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tobago | Generation 9.5 |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 1 September 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 585 | 1234 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 24 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 15 Watt |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Quick Sync |