AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA Quadro 500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 768 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10008 vs 8743
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 22 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10008 vs 8743 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 500M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Quadro 500M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10008 | 8743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 571 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA Quadro 500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tobago | Fermi |
Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 22 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 601 | 602 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Code name | GF108 | |
Price now | $275.14 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDCP | ||
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |