AMD Radeon R9 350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 350 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 350
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 736 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 768 vs 288
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3911 vs 3372
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3911 vs 3372
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9664 vs 3322
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9664 vs 3322
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 vs 14 May 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 736 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 288 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 vs 3372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 vs 3372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 vs 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 vs 3322 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 3828 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27378 vs 10008
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2879 vs 2609
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2879 vs 2609
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 3828 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27378 vs 10008 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2879 vs 2609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2879 vs 2609 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 350
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10008 | 27378 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2609 | 2879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2609 | 2879 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3911 | 3372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3911 | 3372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9664 | 3322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9664 | 3322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 447 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1572 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 350 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tobago | Fermi 2.0 |
| Launch date | 12 June 2015 | 14 May 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 601 | 600 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Code name | GF114 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 736 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1421 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 288 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 847.9 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 35.3 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2 x DisplayPort, DVI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 210 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 91.9 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 3828 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 350 with others
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
ATIRadeon X1600 PRO
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5970
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 500M
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM
AMDRadeon R9 350 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945A
