AMD Radeon R9 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370 and NVIDIA Quadro 500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 700 MHz
  • 7x more texture fill rate: 78 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
  • 13.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 96
  • 9.3x better floating-point performance: 2,496 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4722 vs 571
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 365
  • 8.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 8743
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 22 February 2011
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 96
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4722 vs 571
PassMark - G2D Mark 781 vs 365
Geekbench - OpenCL 75346 vs 8743

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M

  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 110 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 110 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 500M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4722
571
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
781
365
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
75346
8743
Name AMD Radeon R9 370 NVIDIA Quadro 500M
PassMark - G3D Mark 4722 571
PassMark - G2D Mark 781 365
Geekbench - OpenCL 75346 8743
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 64.576
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 336.491
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6096
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 370 NVIDIA Quadro 500M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Trinidad GF108
Launch date 5 May 2015 22 February 2011
Place in performance rating 404 602
Type Desktop Workstation
Price now $275.14
Value for money (0-100) 3.18

Technical info

Boost clock speed 975 MHz
Core clock speed 925 MHz 700 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,496 gflops 268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 1280 96
Texture fill rate 78 GTexel / s 11.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 2,800 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Length 221 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 179.2 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5600 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3