AMD Radeon R9 370X vs AMD Radeon R9 270

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s
  • Around 11% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2,368 gflops
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 55.721
  • Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 261.843
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 3448
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 3448
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 August 2015 vs 13 November 2013
Boost clock speed 1030 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate 82.4 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 2,637 gflops vs 2,368 gflops
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 65.071 vs 55.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 337.583 vs 261.843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8393 vs 3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3704 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3348 vs 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8393 vs 3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3704 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3348 vs 3347

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270

  • Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 180 Watt
  • Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 vs 1139.703
  • Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 vs 5.39
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 vs 88.44
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 180 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1282.039 vs 1139.703
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.927 vs 5.39
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 93.116 vs 88.44

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
65.071
55.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1139.703
1282.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.39
5.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
88.44
93.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
337.583
261.843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8393
3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3704
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3348
3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8393
3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3704
3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3348
3347
Name AMD Radeon R9 370X AMD Radeon R9 270
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 65.071 55.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1139.703 1282.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.39 5.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 88.44 93.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 337.583 261.843
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8393 3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3704 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3348 3347
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8393 3448
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3704 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3348 3347
PassMark - G3D Mark 4306
PassMark - G2D Mark 567
Geekbench - OpenCL 74175
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1603

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 370X AMD Radeon R9 270

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Trinidad Curacao
Launch date 27 August 2015 13 November 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $199 $179
Place in performance rating 516 509
Type Desktop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz 925 MHz
Core clock speed 980 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,637 gflops 2,368 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1280 1280
Texture fill rate 82.4 GTexel / s 74 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 180 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 2,800 million 2,800 million
Stream Processors 1280

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 221 mm 210 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin 1 x 6-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 179.2 GB / s 179.2 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)