AMD Radeon R9 370X vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1030 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s
- Around 11% better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 2,368 gflops
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 55.721
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 261.843
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 3448
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 3448
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 vs 13 November 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 2,368 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 vs 55.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 261.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 180 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1282.039 vs 1139.703
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.927 vs 5.39
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 93.116 vs 88.44
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 vs 1139.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 vs 5.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 vs 88.44 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | 55.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | 1282.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 5.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 93.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 261.843 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 3448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3347 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370X | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | Curacao |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 13 November 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $179 |
Place in performance rating | 516 | 509 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,800 million |
Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 221 mm | 210 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |