AMD Radeon R9 370X vs NVIDIA GeForce 845M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA GeForce 845M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- 3x more texture fill rate: 82.4 GTexel / s vs 27.62 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- 3x better floating-point performance: 2,637 gflops vs 883.7 gflops
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 vs 6112
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 1.295
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 22.387
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 76.073
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 2320
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 3287
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 2320
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 3287
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s vs 27.62 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops vs 883.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 vs 6112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 vs 1.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 vs 22.387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 76.073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 3287 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 3287 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1071 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1176 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 5.5x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 180 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1071 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1176 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce 845M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 | 6112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 1.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 22.387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 76.073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3287 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3287 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3358 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Trinidad | GM108 |
Launch date | 27 August 2015 | 26 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 553 | 1041 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1071 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | 883.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | 27.62 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 221 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |