AMD Radeon R9 370X versus NVIDIA GeForce 845M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 370X and NVIDIA GeForce 845M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 370X
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 82.4 GTexel / s versus 27.62 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,637 gflops versus 883.7 gflops
- Environ 12% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5600 MHz versus 5012 MHz
- 4.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 versus 6112
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 versus 1.295
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 versus 22.387
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 versus 76.073
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 versus 2320
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 3287
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 versus 2320
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 3287
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s versus 27.62 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops versus 883.7 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz versus 5012 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 versus 6112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 versus 1.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 versus 22.387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 versus 76.073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 versus 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 3287 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 versus 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 3287 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 845M
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1071 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 1030 MHz
- 5.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 180 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1071 MHz versus 980 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 1030 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3348 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 370X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 845M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce 845M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 | 6112 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 | 1.295 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 | 22.387 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 | 76.073 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 | 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 3287 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 | 2320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 3287 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3358 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1524 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 213 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R9 370X | NVIDIA GeForce 845M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Trinidad | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 27 August 2015 | 26 August 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $199 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 553 | 1041 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1030 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 1071 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,637 gflops | 883.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 82.4 GTexel / s | 27.62 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,800 million | 1,870 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 221 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 179.2 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |