AMD Radeon R9 380X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 380X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 970 MHz vs 876 MHz
- Around 97% lower typical power consumption: 190 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 138.6x more memory clock speed: 970 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 666 vs 656
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 vs 8124
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 vs 8124
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 2413
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 2413
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 2226
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 2226
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 vs 28 May 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 666 vs 656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 vs 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 vs 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 2226 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 124.2 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 2048
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 3,973 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 vs 6209
- 5.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 3053
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 338 billion / sec vs 124.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops vs 3,973 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8987 vs 6209 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 vs 3053 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6209 | 8987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 666 | 656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 2226 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | 17055 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Antigua | GK110B |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch date | 19 November 2015 | 28 May 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $2,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 313 | 395 |
| Price now | $528.44 | $1,580 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | 6.46 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 970 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops | 2x 5,046 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2880 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
| Core clock speed | 705 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 5760 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 970 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 380X with others
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X
