AMD Radeon R9 380X versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 380X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 380X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 970 MHz versus 876 MHz
- Environ 97% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 190 Watt versus 375 Watt
- 138.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 666 versus 656
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9685 versus 8124
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9685 versus 8124
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 2413
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 2413
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 2226
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 2226
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 November 2015 versus 28 May 2014 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz versus 7.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 666 versus 656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 versus 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 versus 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 2226 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 338 billion / sec versus 124.2 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 2x 2880 versus 2048
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 5,046 gflops versus 3,973 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 versus 6209
- 5.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 versus 3053
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 338 billion / sec versus 124.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 2880 versus 2048 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 5,046 gflops versus 3,973 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8987 versus 6209 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 versus 3053 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 380X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6209 | 8987 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 666 | 656 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9685 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9685 | 8124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 2413 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 2226 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 2226 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3053 | 17055 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 22732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.419 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1261.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.89 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 309.857 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 380X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Antigua | GK110B |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 19 November 2015 | 28 May 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $2,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 313 | 395 |
| Prix maintenant | $528.44 | $1,580 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.61 | 6.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 970 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 32 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,973 gflops | 2x 5,046 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2x 2880 |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 124.2 GTexel / s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 190 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 7,080 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 705 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 5760 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 221 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2 x 6-pin | Two 8-pin |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 182.4 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 970 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 380X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN X
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
AMDRadeon R9 380X vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X
