AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs AMD Radeon Pro 460

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and AMD Radeon Pro 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 6% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 850 MHz
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 925 MHz vs 907 MHz
  • 637.4x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
Launch date 2015 vs 30 October 2016
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 850 MHz
Boost clock speed 925 MHz vs 907 MHz
Texture fill rate 37.00 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 460

  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 679 vs 232
  • 3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3453 vs 1024
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1024 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 679 vs 232
PassMark - G3D Mark 3453 vs 1024

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 460

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
232
679
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1024
3453
Name AMD Radeon R9 A375 AMD Radeon Pro 460
PassMark - G2D Mark 232 679
PassMark - G3D Mark 1024 3453
Geekbench - OpenCL 15277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 44.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 594.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.46
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 55.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 226.93
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 A375 AMD Radeon Pro 460

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 GCN 4.0
Code name Venus Baffin
Launch date 2015 30 October 2016
Place in performance rating 632 635
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 925 MHz 907 MHz
Compute units 10
Core clock speed 900 MHz 850 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1184 GFLOPS
Pipelines 640 1024
Pixel fill rate 14.80 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 37.00 GTexel/s 58.05 GTexel / s
Transistor count 1500 million 3,000 million
Floating-point performance 1,858 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 5.1
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 72 GB/s 81.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) 5080 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0