AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs ATI FirePro V9800
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and ATI FirePro V9800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 544.1x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 68.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Launch date | 2015 vs 9 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s vs 68.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro V9800
- 2.5x more pipelines: 1600 vs 640
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective)
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 655 vs 232
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2727 vs 1024
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1600 vs 640 |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 655 vs 232 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2727 vs 1024 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V9800
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | ATI FirePro V9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 655 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 | 2727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.718 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 738.1 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.153 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 118.756 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 A375 | ATI FirePro V9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Venus | Cypress |
Launch date | 2015 | 9 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 632 | 629 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1184 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 1600 |
Pixel fill rate | 14.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1500 million | 2,154 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,720.0 gflops | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |