AMD Radeon R9 A375 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 A375 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 A375
- Videocard is newer: launch date 21 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 13214.3x more texture fill rate: 37.00 GTexel/s vs 2.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 550 MHz
- 30.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1024 vs 34
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2015 vs 9 August 2004 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s vs 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) vs 550 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 vs 34 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 276 vs 232
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 276 vs 232 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 A375
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 232 | 276 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1024 | 34 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 A375 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Rankine |
| Code name | Venus | NV38 A1 |
| Launch date | 2015 | 9 August 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | 664 | 636 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 925 MHz | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1184 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 14.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 GTexel/s | 2.8 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1500 million | 135 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 9.0a |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 8.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz (4500 MHz effective) | 550 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
