AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8843 vs 3727
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.633 vs 11.448
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 vs 206.777
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 vs 0.792
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 vs 14.637
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 vs 20.86

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

• Around 57% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 28.86 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
• Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1173 vs 1133
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 207
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 vs 1972
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 vs 1765
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3214
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 vs 1972
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 vs 1765
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3214

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1133 1173
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	207 292
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8843 3727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.633 11.448
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	525.038 206.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.169 0.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	37.076 14.637
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.404 20.86
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972 2134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1765 2375
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972 2134
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1765 2375
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 3328

Compare specifications (specs)