AMD Radeon R9 M265X vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M265X and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M265X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 15% better floating-point performance: 800.0 gflops vs 692.7 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8850 vs 3727
- Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.633 vs 11.448
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 525.038 vs 206.777
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.169 vs 0.792
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.076 vs 14.637
- 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.404 vs 20.86
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 vs 5 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops vs 692.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8850 vs 3727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 vs 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 vs 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 vs 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 vs 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 vs 20.86 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 28.86 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 58% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1125 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1178 vs 1125
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 295 vs 202
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2134 vs 1972
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2375 vs 1765
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3214
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2134 vs 1972
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2375 vs 1765
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3214
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 902 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.86 GTexel / s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz vs 1125 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1178 vs 1125 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 295 vs 202 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2134 vs 1972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2375 vs 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2134 vs 1972 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2375 vs 1765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 3214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M265X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R9 M265X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1125 | 1178 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 202 | 295 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8850 | 3727 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.633 | 11.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 525.038 | 206.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.169 | 0.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.076 | 14.637 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.404 | 20.86 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1972 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1765 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1972 | 2134 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1765 | 2375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R9 M265X | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Venus | GK107 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 21 March 2014 | 5 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1196 | 1199 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.25 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 625 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 902 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 25 GTexel / s | 28.86 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,270 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 28.51 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |